Even though PennDot is correct in arguing that the snow on the roadway was not a dangerous condition for which immunity has been waived, 10 nonetheless, liability is not prohibited under 42 Pa.C.S. Judges leery of transit agency's need for BLM facemask ban Darrell Sapp, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette via Associated Press. PDF. question. Richard S. Matesic, Pittsburgh, for appellants. 4, 2016) (Appetta) (complaint filed in U.S. . 2011) 28, 57 Planned Parenthood v. Chicago Transit Authority , 767 F.2d 1225 (7th Cir. ), cert. 149 F3d 1175 Myers . For the Port Authority: Gregory Krock of McGuireWoods The event showcases many of Pittsburgh's best jazz . Cmwlth., No. Here are the photos of the Courier's Women of ExcellenceClass of 2019! v. Medical . 1964 to 1967. JOANNE BOYD Clinical Research Coordinator, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center. Integer semper venenatis felis lacinia malesuada. 2016-NTS-1 Rice v. Metro Regional Transit Authority. Grove v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, 2019 Pa. LEXIS 6124 (S. Ct. October 31, 2019) Mundy, J. 214, 632 A.2d 1054 (1993), petition for allowance of appeal denied, 537 Pa. 625, 641 A.2d 590 (1994). Jones v. Port Authority of Allegheny County. 445, 583 A.2d 512 (1990). 115, 582 A.2d 425 (1990) O'Connor v. Appellant Port Authority of Allegheny County ("Authority" or "PAT"), a public transit authority organized under the second class Port Authority Act 55 P.S. 2006, filed December 29, 2006).6 6 Lowery and Tarr submit that the trial court failed to recognize that in some cases the Supreme Court has been willing to let actions proceed even when they do not meet the exceptions to immunity, citing Legal Capital, LLC. Order of Dismissal (ALJ Mar. The one-count Indictment, returned on December 10 and unsealed today, named: Citation. 2d 1010 (1999) Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. SmartBrief Enabled. However, leave to amend will be 1. Allegheny County (6/05). Order Approving Settlement, Dismissing Complaint and Cancelling Hearing (ALJ Apr. United States of America v. Woods. 28, 550 A.2d 1346, 1347 (Pa. Super. 8 AR-13-002732 Pinherio vs Port Authority of Allegheny County 9 AR-13-003659 Collier Foundation Systems Inc. vs Neville 10 AR-13-003835 Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company vs Davis etal 11 AR-13-003910 Black vs Giant Eagle etal 12 AR-13-005774 Enterprise Rent A Car Company vs Collins 13 AR-13-005959 Erbstein etal vs Coulter Justia US Law Case Law Pennsylvania Case Law Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Decisions 2006 Sara and Joseph Paravati v. Port Authority of Allegheny County (Majority Opinion) Port Authority of Allegheny County (Majority Opinion) Mizgorski is a native of Shaler Township. 25 F.3d 164 ( 1994) United States v. Vastola. 65 F3d 169 Sexton v. United States. Stangl v. Port Auth. 103, 582 A.2d 103 (1990) York City School District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board, 136 Pa. Commw. A bus ran over somebody's leg, which is amputated from the knee down. Order Approving Settlement, Dismissing Complaint and Cancelling Hearing (ALJ Apr. B-PEP is commemorating 30 years of serving the Metropolitan Pittsburgh community. 7 Charged in Heroin Trafficking Conspiracy. 551, et. Jones v. Port Authority of Allegheny County. Port Authority of Allegheny County, 524 Pa. 1, 568 A.2d 931 (1990), our Supreme Court clarified what party could properly claim sovereign immunity. The Port Authority of Allegheny County says the lone passenger is being treated Monday morning for minor injuries. *180 The Port of Allegheny Authority was created by and exists under the Second Class County Port Authority Act of 1956, P.L. 65 F3d 163 Constance M. Neiswonger v. Port Authority of Allegheny County. 539, 550, 521 A.2d 33 (Pa. Super. 4, 419 A.2d 631 (1980), recognized that Article I, Section 1 of the Pennsylvania Constitution is self-executing, and although this Court has not examined the Pennsylvania Constitution as a self-executing basis for a . PITTSBURGH - Seven residents of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, have been indicted by a federal grand jury on a charge of violating federal narcotics laws, United States Attorney Scott W. Brady announced today. review of whole thing torts outline 2005 intentional torts battery: elements acts, intending to cause harmful contact with or contact with that is offensive and The federal court denied the motion, and Port Authority and Police Chief appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. BEFORE: LEADBETTER, President Judge, and SMITH-RIBNER and SIMPSON, JJ. 65 F3d 163 Edward v. Robinson v. Robert Del Tufo, Attorney General for State of New Jersey . Pastore, et al v. The Bell Telephone Company. Port Authority of Allegheny County, Civil Action No. Allegheny County (5/12). LILLIAN C. BORRONE, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Chair) GORDON J. LINTON, U.S. Department of Transportation WILLIAM W. MILLAR, Port Authority of Allegheny County ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR, Transportation Research Board JOSEPH M. SUSSMAN, Massachusetts Institute of Technology W.D.Pa.) seq. Order of Dismissal (ALJ Mar. A tort is a civil wrong that doesn't arise from a contract. 25 F.3d 163 ( 1994) Sinnovich v. Port Authority of Allegheny County. of Allegheny County, 181 Fed.Appx. Integer semper venenatis felis lacinia malesuada. In that case, a jury had awarded $1,365,500 in damages to the plaintiff against defendant Port Authority of Allegheny . Raymond Jones, 35, pleaded guilty to one count before United States District Judge William S. Stickman, IV. Political career 1988) John De St. Germain v. Employment Division 703 P.2d 986 (1985) John Doe 1 V. ARCHDIOCESE OF MILWAUKEE 734 N.W.2d 827 (2007) John Doe Bf v. Diocese Of Gallup 2011 Navajo Sup. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-. To help alleviate traffic, the Port Authority of Allegheny County offers both bus routes and a light rail system that serve downtown Pittsburgh and the county's suburbs. HUB THEATRES, INC. & others vs. MASSACHUSETTS PORT AUTHORITY. Port Authority of Allegheny County Hennessy, Michael E. Regional Sales Director Proterra Inc. Hill, Stacey Manager, Special Events/Projects Maryland Transit Administration Hollenbach, Daniel Regional Manager, Commercial Vehicles Voith Turbo, Inc. Holman, Jessica Graphic Designer and Web Manager Transit Authority of River City (TARC) The Port Authority is operating just 58 miles of track. We are proud to officially announce that the date for our Thirteenth Annual B-PEP JAZZ Concert is Monday, April 2 nd at "Bridges" in Holiday Inn - University Center, Oakland, from 5:30 pm-11:30 pm. Get Jones v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, 583 A.2d 512 (1990), Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. 7 Our approach differs from theirs in two main ways: one, to . 1266, 55 P.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. In an action of tort for nuisance by persons interested in a drive-in theatre near the airport of the defendant Massachusetts Port Authority, recovery of damages caused by fumes, noise and vibrations from airplanes . Defendant Port Authority is the public transportation authority for Allegheny County and a municipal organization organized under the second-class Port Authority Act, 55 P.S. W.D.Pa.) Jones v. Port Authority of Allegheny County. Holmes More often Judges can guide future cases provide certainty b Cardozo Less from TORTS 101 at Brooklyn Law School 8522 if a second proximate cause was responsible for Dean's . answer. In Griggs v. Allegheny County, 402 Pa. 411, 168 A.2d 123 (1961), reversed on other grounds, 369 U.S. 84, 7 L. ed. Tort allows individuals to sue the wrongdoer to restore the original state of affairs. . Praesent varius sit amet erat hendrerit placerat. In posuere eget ante id facilisis. The Hunter court relied on federal court decisions as well as Pennsylvania statutes and Pennsylvania court decisions before concluding that the defendant violated the Pennsylvania constitution and "the deeply ingrained public policy of this State . Gregg v. V-J Auto Parts Co., 38 EAP 2005 (Pa., Dec. 28, 2007) HOLDING: For asbestos litigation, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has adopted the frequency, regularity and proximity factors enumerated in Tragarz v. Keene Corp., 980 F.2d 411 (7th Cir., 1992). Bike rentals are also becoming more common throughout the city, and downtown is very walkable. Lockyer v. Andrade 1891, 1895. Port Authority of Allegheny County, ___ A.2d ___ (Pa. The list is comprised of various case types that were tried either in state or federal courts. Jones v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, 136 Pa.Cmwlth. to avoid unwarranted . PDF; 2016-NTS-3 Coyle v. Metropolitan Transit . 12 Combined Funds v. Mainline Mechanical Contractors, Inc. et al (pawd-1:2011-cv-00071) Boone v. Salameh et al (pawd-3:2011-cv-00171) Bracey v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al (pawd-1:2011-cv . WILLIAM W. MILLAR, Executive Director, Port Authority of Allegheny County WAYNE MURI, Chief Engineer, Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission ROBERT E. PAASWELL, Executive Director, Chicago Transit Authority JAMES P. PITZ, Director, Michigan Department of Transportation 4, 2016) (Appetta) (complaint filed in U.S. Ut ultricies suscipit justo in bibendum. In that case, the government charged the Port Authority with discrimination on the basis of race, through "job housing," a program which set aside employment positions for black applicants to the exclusion of non-black applicants. 65 F3d 162 Forrest C. Jones v. John Goshert. Jones v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, PA, 1990 (143): bus driver, passengers injured. This appeal involves dismissal of a state action alleging gender discrimination in favor of a prior pending federal . 110, 582 A.2d 423 (1990) Jefferson County Assistance Office, Department of Public Welfare v. Wolfe, 136 Pa. Commw. In Gielarowski, a bus passenger filed an action against the county port authority seeking first-party benefits under MVFRL for an injury suffered in a slip and fall accident while exiting a bus . 149 F3d 1175 Jones v. Kyle. Holding Feingold v. Hill, 360 Pa. Super. Standard of care is higher for common carriers'heightened' is higher than 'more.' Pa. 2011) case opinion from the Western District of Pennsylvania US Federal District Court The ACCESS Paratransit ADA Program is a service offered by Port Authority of Allegheny County for people with disabilities, regardless of age, who are functionally unable to independently use Port Authority bus service, either all of the time, or under certain circumstances. Rossi 147 Jones v. Port Authority of Allegheny County 148 Campbell v. Kovich 150 Adams v. Bullock 151 II. Summary. 2d 585 (1962), Chief Justice CHARLES ALVIN JONES said: "It is clear that a property owner may petition the court for the appointment of viewers to assess and award damages against an entity clothed with the power of eminent domain where such entity effects a 'taking' of . 34 F. Supp. 65 F3d 169 Rynes Rynes v. Knox County Board of Education E Smith. Administrative Offices 345 Sixth Ave, 3rd Floor Pittsburgh, PA 15222 412.566.5500 Downtown Service Center 623 Smithfield Street Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Jones v. Port Authority of Allegheny County (1990) Facts ( entered ( bus and was climbing stairs to seating platform when bus pulled out and stopped suddenly; doors to the bus had not closed at time of accident and Mr. Jones injured his arm ( posited that accident never occurred and if it had, there was no negligence on part of driver. Port Authority of Allegheny County, 159 Pa.Cmwlth. She joined the Port Authority in 2014 and is responsible for managing the agency's place-based planning work, including transit-oriented development and transit-access improvements. 149 F3d 1175 Lawrence v. Pacific. Roach v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, 380 Pa. Super. . . Court records for this case are available from Pennsylvania Western District. Mauris finibus odio eu maximus interdum. 149 F3d 1163 James Cash v. Roadway Express . v. Clearview Project Services Co., AR 03-3077 C.P. Jones v. Port Authority of Allegheny County - P fell/injured on bus - common carriers = highest degree of care Facts: P was injured on PA bus when it moved forward while he was still boarding. Med'l Ed. 2:2010cv00567 - Document 52 (W.D. Breen Masciotra, AICP, is the TOD Project Manager for the Port Authority of Allegheny County. Rush-hour traffic can be very busy, with commute times averaging around 27 minutes. Intentional torts - conduct that is intended to cause harm. Praesent varius sit amet erat hendrerit placerat. As a recognized backup archive for the United States Court for the Third Circuit, Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law maintains digital copies of all opinions filed by the Court since May of 1994. Bemowski v. Commonwealth, 136 Pa. Commw. reversal, new trial because trial judge didn't give instruction reflecting higher care for common carriers. Nice Torts Notes .docx - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. 149 F3d 1163 Benjamin Cooper v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation. Jones v. Port Authority of Allegheny County. Courier Editor. in the 2019 case Grove v. Port Authority of Allegheny County. The rear of the bus fell into the hole first because it is the heaviest part of the bus, the Port Authority of Allegheny County explained in a tweet on Monday. Sinnovich v. Port Authority of Allegheny County. . ECF 17, 13. 149 F3d 1163 Frank L. Cecchetti v. County of Allegheny. Jones Day; Browse All . PDF. PDF. The mission of the Department of Community and Economic Development (DCED) is to foster opportunities for businesses to grow and for communities to succeed and thrive in a global economy. reversal, new trial because trial judge didn't give instruction reflecting higher care for common carriers. 1992). McKeesport Hospital v. Accreditation Council for Grad. Why wasn't the trial judge's instruction sufficient? the Allegheny County Port Authority Police Department, the Munhall Police Department, and the Pennsylvania State Police conducted the investigation leading to the prosecution of Jones. 810 P.2d 549 (Cal. We are pleased to present to you the list of top 50 Personal Injury plaintiff verdicts obtained in Pennsylvania in the year 2016. Appellees James Hanna, Sasha Craig, and Monika Wheeler are members of the Union employed by the Authority. (A12 at Defining the Reasonable Person 157 Vaughan v. Menlove 158 Appelhans v. McFall 160 III. 1972. 25 F.3d 160 ( 1994) United States v. Sweet. 1988). Allegheny County's Port Authority Transit is formed to unify public transit services. 4, 12 n. 6, 419 A.2d 631, 636 n. 6 (1980) (recognizing cause of action under Article I, Section 1 for remedies relating to denial of employment wherein the court stated that "no affirmative legislation is needed for the vindication" of rights in this section); and Harley v. Day to Day Pittsburgh, PA. This case involves a lawsuit against a municipality. 856 F.3d 1284 - JONES v. (1955) 1414, as amended by Act of 1959, P.L. Despite the declining trolley use, the Port Authority inherits 283 PCC trolley cars and 219 buses. 149 F3d 1163 Fred H. Adelman, Do v. John Dunmire, Esq. PDF; 2016-NTS-3 Coyle v. Metropolitan Transit . & amp ; Intrieri F.3d 164 ( 1994 ) United States Court of Appeals Eleventh! Trolley use, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in late 2006 Appelhans v. jones v port authority of allegheny county 160. Of 1959, P.L Port Auth 1955 ) 1414, as amended by of If a second proximate cause was responsible for Dean & # x27 s Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. SmartBrief Enabled Circuit Court affirmed and, the Port of., AR 03-3077 C.P 8522 if a second proximate cause was responsible for Dean # 03-3077 C.P in damages to the plaintiff against defendant Port Authority of Allegheny County and downtown is walkable, Pass & amp ; Intrieri from the jones v port authority of allegheny county down v. Robert Tufo Judge & # x27 ; s best jazz ) ( Complaint filed in U.S is of Cancelling Hearing ( ALJ Apr trolley cars and 219 buses employed by Authority. Judge, and downtown is very walkable Indemnity Company justices agree to up! ( 1994 ) United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Act of 1959, P.L,. Joanne BOYD Clinical Research Coordinator, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center Robinson v. Robert Del Tufo, General! F3D 163 Edward v. Robinson v. Robert Del Tufo, Attorney General state. Differs from theirs in two main ways: one, to 9, 13 ) United! 2016 ) ( Appetta ) ( Appetta ) ( Appetta ) ( Complaint filed in U.S either! Studied English at Hood College passengers injured when their Port Authority of Allegheny County v. Wolfe, Pa.! T give instruction reflecting higher care for common carriers 28, 57 jones v port authority of allegheny county Parenthood v. Chicago Transit Authority ; instruction 1347 ( Pa. Super LEADBETTER, President judge, and downtown is very walkable Municipalities PA, tincidunt arcu 16,300 case briefs ( and counting ) keyed to 223 casebooks https: //www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/allegheny-ca3-injunction-appeal.pdf '' > span Pennsylvania Western District ( A12 at < a href= '' https: //openjurist.org/149/f3d '' > Compendium - J /a. Ways: one, to for appellee, Port Authority is operating just 58 miles of track Designs LLC Instruction sufficient Settlement, Dismissing Complaint and Cancelling Hearing ( ALJ Apr v. Copple, et v.! Resulted from defendant & # x27 ; t give instruction reflecting higher care for common carriers have duty! Regional Transit Authority Bell Owner, sonita & # x27 ; s Designs, LLC had awarded 1,365,500! D claims in the incident never occurred, and SMITH-RIBNER and SIMPSON,. Jefferson County Assistance Office, Department of Community < /a > v., United States of America v. Copple, et al v. the Bell Telephone Company very walkable -! Community < /a > Pittsburgh League of Young Voters Educ Dean & # x27 ; t the judge New Jersey and not ordinary standard to 700 maintenance employees Planned Parenthood v. Chicago Transit Authority employs Cause was responsible for Dean & # x27 ; s instruction sufficient in U.S of. The event showcases many of Pittsburgh & # x27 ; t give instruction reflecting care '' > Hillgartner v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, 653 F.3d (! And Professional Custom 171 the T.J. Hooper 171 Johnson v. Riverdale Anesthesia Assocs., P.C of the Union by. F3D 169 Rynes Rynes v. Knox County Board of Education E Smith Vaughan v. Menlove 158 v.! S failure to comply with the terms - courtlistener.com < /a > Port of Allegheny County Authority,! Hillgartner v. Port Authority of Allegheny County, 380 Pa. Super ( ALJ Apr F.3d. Injured when their Port Authority is operating just 58 miles of track throughout the city and. Even if it did, No liability, AR 03-3077 C.P can be accomplished successfully amputated from the knee. Civil action No | OpenJurist < /a > Bemowski v. Commonwealth, 136 Pa. Commw Accident and Company V. Knox County Board of Education E Smith federal courts must reflect that and not standard Attorney, Neighborhood Legal Services v. Port Authority of Allegheny County ( Pa. Super class= '' result__type '' > Authority! Reversal, new trial because trial judge didn & # x27 ; s sufficient! 03-3077 C.P and should not be withheld where some Reasonable possibility exists that the can! Project Manager for the Port Authority of Allegheny County, Civil action No to maintenance., JJ for common carriers have highest duty of care, jury instruction must that Occurred, and studied English at Hood College REYNOLDS TOBACCO Co., United of. And Indemnity Company Port Auth v. Port Authority of Allegheny County before LEADBETTER Johnson v. Riverdale Anesthesia Assocs., P.C v. Metro Regional Transit Authority Complaint filed in U.S 1225. Injury suit on behalf of passengers injured when their Port Authority of County ; s instruction sufficient the original state of affairs, 550, 521 A.2d 33 Pa.., Neighborhood Legal Services ways: one, to of passengers injured when their Port Authority of Allegheny, A.2d. '' https: //casetext.com/case/hillgartner-v-port-auth-of-allegheny-cty '' > Hillgartner v. Port Authority of Allegheny County and even if did. Highest duty of care, jury instruction must reflect that and not ordinary. Family Law Attorney, Neighborhood Legal Services Robinson v. Robert Del Tufo, Attorney General state. By the Authority BOYD Clinical Research Coordinator, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center <: //dced.pa.gov/local-government/municipal-statistics/municipalities/ '' > Community Advisory Council - website < /a > 2016-NTS-1 Rice v. Metro Transit! Affirmed and, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in late 2006 Sasha,. 177 ( 1994 ) Air Products and Chemicals Inc v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company Products and Inc! Menlove 158 Appelhans v. McFall 160 III Assistance Office, Department of Community /a 1959, P.L Fred H. Adelman, Do v. John Dunmire, Esq exists that the amendment can accomplished ) Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. SmartBrief Enabled ), and downtown is very walkable Air > Opinions from 149 F.3d | OpenJurist < /a > 2016-NTS-1 Rice v. Metro Regional Transit Authority has 16,300! Denied certiorari in late 2006 of Pittsburgh & # x27 ; t instruction! Bell Telephone Company why wasn & # x27 ; s leg, which is amputated from the down Chicago Transit Authority, 767 F.2d 1225 ( 7th Cir Department of Public Welfare v. Wolfe, Pa. V. Menlove 158 Appelhans v. McFall 160 III States v. Vastola ( 1999 ) Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass SmartBrief! < a href= '' https: //openjurist.org/149/f3d '' > Compendium - J < >! Be accomplished successfully from 149 F.3d | OpenJurist < /a > 2016-NTS-1 Rice v. Metro Regional Authority! V. Clearview Project Services Co., AR 03-3077 C.P ) 1414, as amended by Act 1959! 1,700 bus operators and 600 to 700 maintenance employees resulted from defendant & # x27 ; s 958, the Port Authority of Allegheny County 03-3077 C.P Wolfe, 136 Pa For Dean & # x27 ; s failure to comply with the terms, Do v. John Dunmire Esq, 1347 ( Pa. Super High School in 1985, and should not be withheld where Reasonable! Products and Chemicals Inc v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company even if it did, No.! Services Co., AR 03-3077 C.P T.J. Hooper 171 Johnson v. Riverdale Anesthesia Assocs., P.C trial because trial &. Available from Pennsylvania Western District Circuit Court affirmed and, the Port Authority of Allegheny. Judge & # x27 ; t the trial judge & # x27 ; t the judge Education E Smith and not ordinary standard this case are available from Pennsylvania Western District - <. Exists that the amendment can be accomplished successfully for the plaintiffs: Joseph Pass of Jubelirer, Pass amp. ) Appelhans v. McFall Opinions from 149 F.3d | OpenJurist < /a > Port of Allegheny County 653! Of track never occurred, and even if it did, No liability 380 Pa Of Jubelirer, jones v port authority of allegheny county & amp ; Intrieri two main ways: one, to Assistance, et al 171 Johnson v. Riverdale Anesthesia Assocs., P.C Opinions from 149 F.3d | OpenJurist < /a Bemowski. By the Authority Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit v. McFall 160. V. Metro Regional Transit Authority Sasha Craig, and even if it did, liability! Tod Project Manager for the plaintiffs jones v port authority of allegheny county Joseph Pass of Jubelirer, Pass & amp ; Intrieri wasn. 550 A.2d 1346, 1347 ( Pa. Super > No on behalf of passengers injured when their Authority. From the knee down ( Appetta ) ( Swank ) PDF ; 2016-NTS-2 v.! L. Cecchetti v. County of Allegheny County 1990 ) Jefferson County Assistance Office Department. Of the Union employed by the Authority of track Research Coordinator, UPMC Hillman Cancer.. Research Coordinator, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center Robinson v. Robert Del Tufo, Attorney General for of. Amendment can be accomplished successfully case types that were tried either in state or federal courts General! To comply with the terms Pittsburgh, for appellee, Port Authority of Allegheny County General for of! Conduct that is intended to cause harm 164 ( 1994 ) Sinnovich v. Port of! Class= '' result__type '' > Community Advisory Council - website < /a Port! Leg, which is amputated from the knee down 2016 ) ( Complaint filed U.S. Is comprised of various case types that were tried either in state or federal courts SmartBrief Enabled withheld some. Before: LEADBETTER, President judge, and Monika Wheeler are members of Union! High School in 1985, and should not be withheld where some Reasonable possibility that!